When Candide is going to travel to Venice, he needs someone to accompany him. Here is were Martin is introduced to the story. He is a poor scholar who has been living a pretty tragic life. He is somehow similar to Candide, considering the fact that they both live tragedy after tragedy. But then I noticed a mayor difference between them. While Candide is Naive and very optimistic, Martin seems to have a realistic view upon life. Finally, there is a character that is not drowning on its own optimism.
“ ‘What a pessimist you are!’ Exclaimed Candide.
‘That is because I know what life is,’ said Martin.”
Candide is a little confused by Martin’s pessimism. He was used to Pangloss and his absurdly optimistic theories. While Pangloss constantly reminded Candide about all the positive things in a situation, Martin points out the crude reality in them. This actually makes me like Martin. I was a Little tired of so much absurd optimism. There were plenty of situations that were frustrating me already. For example, the way Candide just decides to trust people and gives away his money so easily. I’m pretty sure Voltaire would want me to laugh at Candide, but actually I want him to stop being so naïve. Hopefully, Martin will somehow make Candide understand that not everything is for the best.
The comparisons between these two characters made me wonder: Is it better to be a pessimist or an optimist? As an optimist you will probably be a happier person. You will see the best in every scenario and if things go wrong, you will always turn things around. As a pessimist, you will be prepared for any situation. If things go wrong, you already predicted it. But if they go right, you will be pleasantly surprised. I am more of an optimist, but I am not convinced it is the best option.

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario